Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in elderly patients: tolerance and compliance in a series of 137 patients

Introduction: Aggressive cancer treatment is a challenge in elderly patients. The present study aims to assess tolerance in terms of acute toxicity and compliance of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT) in a series of patients aged C70 years. Materials and methods Clinical: records of patients aged C70 years who underwent cCRT between January 2005 and December 2013 were reviewed. Concurrent CRT had curative intent in 134 patients (97.8 %) and palliative intent in 3 patients (2.2 %). Chemotherapy (CT) drugs and schedule were selected according to tumor histology. Radiotherapy median dose was 45.0 Gy (range 11-70 Gy) for curative purposes and 54 Gy (range 40-56 Gy) for palliative purposes. Incidence of acute toxicity and compliance to cCRT were analyzed and correlated with age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results: Overall, 137 patients, 82 males (60 %) and 55 females (40 %), median age 74 years (range 70–90 years) were analyzed. Concurrent CRT schedule was completed by 132 patients (96.4 %). Thirty-one of these patients (23.5 %) temporarily interrupted treatment. Hematological toxicity with grade C1 was observed in 25 patients (18.2 %), gastrointestinal toxicity in 55 (40.1 %), and genitourinary in 13 (9.5 %). Mucositis with grade C1 was recorded in 19 patients (13.9 %). No statistical significant correlation between KPS, CCI, and toxicity was found. A correlation trend between mucositis and patient age (p = 0.05) was observed. Conclusion: Concurrent CRT for elderly was feasible and quite well tolerated. Great attention in prescribing CT dose should be paid to limit acute toxicity (AU)

No disponible

Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in elderly patients: tolerance and compliance in a series of 137 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Aggressive cancer treatment is a challenge in elderly patients. The present study aims to assess tolerance in terms of acute toxicity and compliance of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT) in a series of patients aged ≥70 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical records of patients aged ≥70 years who underwent cCRT between January 2005 and December 2013 were reviewed. Concurrent CRT had curative intent in 134 patients (97.8 %) and palliative intent in 3 patients (2.2 %). Chemotherapy (CT) drugs and schedule were selected according to tumor histology. Radiotherapy median dose was 45.0 Gy (range 11-70 Gy) for curative purposes and 54 Gy (range 40-56 Gy) for palliative purposes. Incidence of acute toxicity and compliance to cCRT were analyzed and correlated with age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: Overall, 137 patients, 82 males (60 %) and 55 females (40 %), median age 74 years (range 70-90 years) were analyzed. Concurrent CRT schedule was completed by 132 patients (96.4 %). Thirty-one of these patients (23.5 %) temporarily interrupted treatment. Hematological toxicity with grade ≥1 was observed in 25 patients (18.2 %), gastrointestinal toxicity in 55 (40.1 %), and genitourinary in 13 (9.5 %). Mucositis with grade ≥1 was recorded in 19 patients (13.9 %). No statistical significant correlation between KPS, CCI, and toxicity was found. A correlation trend between mucositis and patient age (p = 0.05) was observed. CONCLUSION: Concurrent CRT for elderly was feasible and quite well tolerated. Great attention in prescribing CT dose should be paid to limit acute toxicity.

[Comparison of 3 methods of preparation for colonoscopy]. / Confronto fra 3 schemi di preparazione alla coloscopia.

We compared three cleansing methods of preparation for colonoscopy in 150 patients: the first containing a mixture of cathartics, especially sennosides: the second containing polyethyleneglycol: the third containing a mixture of monosodic monohydrated and bisodic heptahydrated phosphate. We evaluated the tolerability, the compliance and the side effects of the preparations. Regarding the evaluated parameters, it was found that the mixture of monosodic and bisodic heptahydrated phosphate was more valid than the other preparations.